@InProceedings{TomasellaBoOrRoCuNoPr:2010:HyReAm,
author = "Tomasella, Javier and Borma, Laura and Orsini, Jos{\'e} Antonio
Marengo and Rodriguez, Daniel Andr{\'e}s and Cuartas, L Adriana
and Nobre, Carlos Afonso and Prado, Maria Cecilia Rodrigues do",
affiliation = "{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto
Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de
Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas
Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais
(INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and
{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)}",
title = "Hydrological Response of the Amazon River to the Droughts of
1996-97 and 2004-2005 (Invited)",
booktitle = "Proceedings...",
year = "2010",
organization = "The Meeting of the Americas.",
publisher = "AGU",
keywords = "climate impacts, drought, extreme events, floodplain dynamics.",
abstract = "Severe hydrological droughts in the Amazon have generally been
associated to strong El Niņo events. More than 100 years of stage
record at the port of Manaus confirm that minimum water levels
generally coincide with intense warming in the tropical Pacific
sea waters. During 2005, however, the Amazon experienced a severe
drought with great ecological and social impact, and who was not
associated to an El Niņo event. Unless what usually occur during
strong El Niņo events, when negative rainfall anomalies usually
affect central and eastern Amazon drainage basin; rainfall
deficiencies in the drought of 2005 were spatially constrained to
the west and southwest of the basin. In spite of this, discharge
stations at the main stem recorded minimum water levels as low as
those observed during the basin-wide 1996-97 El Niņo related
drought. Besides this, stage data and satellite images indicate
that floodplain lakes surface areas were more reduced during the
recent drought. This paper examines why river discharges were so
low during the 2005, even though rainfall deficits were restricted
to a fraction of the whole basin, and why the impacts on the main
stem floodplain were so severe. The analysis of river discharges
along the main stem and major tributaries during the drought of
2005 revealed that the recession on major tributaries began almost
simultaneously. This was not the case in the 1996-97 drought, when
above normal contribution of some tributaries for a short period
during high water were crucial to partially counter balance high
discharge deficits of the other tributaries. Since time-lagged
contributions of major tributaries are fundamental to damp the
extremes in the main stem, an almost coincident recession in
almost all tributaries caused a rapid decreased of water
discharges during the 2005 event. Perhaps one of the most
important lessons to be learnt from the drought of 2005 is that,
from a hydrological point of view, more importantly than the size
of the area affected by negative rainfall anomalies is the timing
and location where those rainfall deficits occur. In conclusion,
localized drought might have a greater impact on main stem river
discharges providing rainfall deficiencies produces a simultaneous
recession of major tributaries.",
conference-location = "Foz do Igua{\c{c}}u",
conference-year = "8-12 aug. 2010",
language = "en",
targetfile = "Tomasella_Hydrological.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "21 maio 2024"
}